AZ Republic Shills for Mesa Photo Program (Again)



The Republic is at it again. In another display of journalism at its worst, Arizona Republic writer Nathan Gonzalez spreads propaganda and tries to give credit to Mesa’s photo enforcement program where credit isn’t due.

In what is truly a stretch of a headline, the Republic proclaims, “Mesa police credit photo enforcement for accident decline.” Never mind that quotes from police Sgt. Andy Nesbit in the same article contradict this, “Understand, though, that we can’t say photo safety is the cause.” In fact Nesbit point out that several other factors have probably helped, “Traffic patrols and the city’s involvement in DUI task forces have played a role along with the photo-enforcement program,” Nesbit said.

Proper journalism would call for an interview of an expert on the matter such as a city traffic engineer as well as a comparison of data to other cities and regional and national trends. Had Nathan done this, he’d have shown a national trend of a reduction in fatalities of about 9%, and a 18-20% reduction in overall accidents. The traffic engineer could have also provided data on traffic volume through the city, as the number of miles traveled can have a huge impact on crash numbers. When these facts are considered, Mesa probably saw an INCREASE in accidents and fatalities, as Mesa reports that the number of fatalities was unchanged and a reduction in overall crashes of only 7% – significantly less than national averages. Accidents are usually categorized as either non-injury, injury, and fatality. Curiously, the article omits injury accident numbers.

Nathan also attempts the classical tactic of using emotion to tug at the readers heartstrings by opening the article with a story about a fatal accident involving a red light runner. It’s unclear because of how it’s (purposefully?) written, but the person killed in the accident was actually the person who ran the red light as explained in this article. There’s not enough information to draw any solid conclusions, but our money says that the 60-year-old woman probably wasn’t merely trying to “beat the light” or avoid sitting in traffic and that a camera would not have made any difference except to mail her a ticket a few weeks later.

The article also highlights the ineffectiveness of the photo enforcement system but glosses over these facts:

Of the photo-radar speed tickets generated, Mesa Municipal Court documents indicate that 7,693 were paid last year and 8,488 were either dismissed by the Police Department or dismissed because the driver wasn’t served with the ticket.

Of the red-light citations, 4,849 were paid and 6,139 were dismissed.

This gives the speed tickets an effectiveness rate of only 48%, and red light tickets a rate of 44%. So much for fair “law enforcement.” The rates get even worse if you consider the total number of citations which were mentioned in the side bar. Total speed citations: 23,533. Total Red Light citations: 18,200.

Another curious observation is the lack of the ability to comment on the story. Afraid of letting the truth get in the way again, Arizona Republic?

12 Responses to AZ Republic Shills for Mesa Photo Program (Again)

  1. Typical AZ Repulsive.

    Remember they were the ones that were constant cheerleaders of the Housing Boom and failed to recognize that there actually was a bubble that burst until well after it had happened. Zero cred as far as I am concerned.

  2. Stacey says:

    Toll road scandal and cameras too!

    http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/31/3112.asp

  3. Brent says:

    The AZ-Republic hasn’t been considered a journalism outlet for several years, I don’t know why we’d expect them to use Reporting 101 skills now..

  4. LoneWolf says:

    Hmmm.. wonder why the comment section is closed on that AZ Central article. It appears they don’t want the truth to be exposed by us & other anti-scam people..

  5. Stacey says:

    The Securities and Exchange Commission on Friday charged Goldman Sachs, with defrauding investors:

    http://money.cnn.com/2010/04/16/news/companies/sec.goldman.fortune/index.htm?hpt=T2

    • jgunn says:

      Say it ain’t so! I thought they were on the up and up! Especially after they invested on that great wholesome enterprise that is the photo enforcement industry.

      http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/business/articles/2008/09/26/20080926biz-ATS0926.html

      Photo enforcement is getting a big financial boost from a major New York investment bank.

      Goldman Sachs Group Inc. has paid more than $50 million for a minority stake in American Traffic Solutions Inc., the two companies announced Thursday.

      The privately held Scottsdale-based photo-enforcement company declined to disclose the exact amount invested, but Chief Executive Officer Jim Tuton told The Arizona Republic that it was between $50 million and $100 million.

      American Traffic said the funds would be used to support growth in its traffic-safety enforcement and electronic toll-payment businesses.

  6. RPr says:

    I could’ve eaten Alphabits and crapped out a better article than the repugnant wrote

  7. guttersn1pe says:

    The AZ Republic is by far the worst “news” publication I’ve ever read. I’m actually embarassed to say that I have indeed read it. No worries – that’s a mistake that I’m happy to say I haven’t continue to make.

    • Brent says:

      At least O’Reilly got his opinions and facts straight on both types of scameras. I was shocked Stossel floundered on speed cameras with the sheep response- very unlike him..

  8. JOKN says:

    Does the contract end before the vote , will they shut them off till the vote , will they use those (off) stats if things got worse at the vote, you get my drift

  9. Dr Jett says:

    63% of Arizona drivers were in favor of cameras according to the Stossel article? Those were the statistics that Redflex claims when I have personally seen 80-90% of the voters asked to sign a petition to get rid of the cameras were against photo radar of any kind and signed our petition. The Az Repugnant wouldn’t publish any of my letters last year because the truth was too controversial according to their editors. Biased news is merely propaganda when they don’t use independent surveys.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: